by Wanda Ottewell
Last blog I promised that we’d tackle some of the things I don’t like to see in stories. To be honest, I’m a little worried this post will become negative, and I don’t want to be the downer in the group! So to counter that, let’s all say out loud from the start: We love to read romance books! Say it again, for good measure. Go on, do it (and ignore the funny looks your kids and coworkers are tossing your way). I think it’s important to remember we love these stories before we start itemizing what we can’t stand.
So, love of the genre firmly in place, let’s talk about what drives us crazy.
One of the things that can make me put down a manuscript or a book in no seconds flat is silly characters who act in unbelievable ways. You know the ones who have no justification or rationale for acting the way they do. The ones who seem to defy all logic when they take action or make a decision or assess a situation. What is that acronym? TSTL—too stupid to live. Who can relate to those characters? And if I can’t relate, it’s impossible to get into the story.
Closely related to that pet peeve are those secondary characters who are merely plot devices. They have only one purpose—whether it’s to reveal a single piece of information, complicate the conflict (or, worse, be the conflict) or make the situation worse. They seem to be conveniently dropped on the page, do their bit and disappear without ever giving the sense that they are fully developed characters or that they even belong in the story. Usually when I encounter these characters, I strongly encourage the author to integrate the character in the story (which usually means fleshing out him/her) or cutting him/her entirely and finding a different way to unfold the plot.
Repetition is a huge issue for me. I don’t mean the kind of strategic, deliberate repetition that creates effect or escalates tension. I’m talking about the other kind: overused words, phrases, gestures, actions, scene set-ups, etc. that litter a story. Repetition sends the message the author has nothing more to say. No more words to use, no more actions to describe (and, by extension, the character has no other reactions), no more events to relate. And if there’s nothing more to say, why keep writing and why should the reader keep reading? I confess I nag about this…a lot (authors who have worked with me are nodding their heads and rolling their eyes!). I believe it’s important to be articulate, to relate the story in an engaging, unique way and to give the reader a varied experience. There is one author whose stories I love (and no, I’m not revealing names). Despite how much I love her books, I can’t read them too close together because she has a couple of phrases her characters—all her characters—repeat. Guaranteed in every book these phrases will occur at least four times. And it so happens that the phrases drive me nuts!
I’m not a fan of putting narrative focus on characters’ movements through a scene and on inanimate objects. Yes, there needs to be a certain amount of description of the characters moving and relevant objects in the scene to set the stage in the reader’s mind and prevent the characters from being talking heads. However, when a character who is already frowning frowns again…and again…and again in the same scene, well, that’s annoying. And if I know more about the movement of a coffee cup (cup filled with coffee, sugar and cream stirred in, cup lifted to mouth, cup put on table, cup fiddled with, up to the mouth again, etc.) than the point of view character’s inner reactions to the unfolding events, then I want to scream. Gestures (the throwaway kind such as nodding, frowning, smiling/grinning, etc.) and shifting inanimate objects don’t make a scene active. They don’t add tension to a scene. They don’t advance the plot. And they rarely reveal character. Their role is to provide backdrop, to fill in scene detail, and as such, they should receive only that much attention and no more.
There are other qualities that I don’t like to see, but I think it’s time to turn it over to you.
Tell me about what make you throw a book against the wall in disgust and what makes you decide to take a writer off your auto-buy list. And because we love this genre (say it one more time!), let’s keep it general and anonymous—no outing of specific books or authors. You know that old saying about one person’s garbage... ;-)
Let the discussion begin!
Wanda is on holiday so we are brining you this BEST OF BLOG in case you missed it the first time around. We are also still drawing for a Super Six pack. If you have any burning questions for Wanda go ahead an ask, she may just turn your topic into her next blog!

14 comments:
For me at the moment it's badly written stories. Poor editing. The idea was there & then I would stumble upon blooper after blooper, often in one sentence. I don't mind how a book is made available or published, but PLEASE take time to polish it up. I must say though that this does not seem to happen with established authors, they respect the reader.
If you've 'snuck in' to take a look, Wanda. I hope that you're having a wonderful holiday.
As an aspiring Superromance author, that's a great list of things you don't want to see. I'll be checking my manuscript for those pet hates.
I know you've probably answered this question before, but what don't you see enough of?
Now that the word count has been increased to 85k, how would you like to see those extra ten thousand words utilized in a ms?
My pet hate is when the same point is labored over and over again. Almost as if the author doesn't trust me to 'get it'.
Toni
Bad grammar, calling a hero/heroine by the name of an older lover or the protagonist, and pretty much all the stuff Wanda mentioned will put me off a story. If I have to think... wait a minute that's not the hero/heroine's name while reading, or come across gramatically incorrect sentences (and I don't mean speech, but in the narratives) it throws me off and it sometimes takes me awhile to get back into the story.
Toni - That's something I have a problem with, and I've figured out it's because of "how" I write. I don't write a rough draft, then layer, then layer again. I write very linear and I build. I notice I hammer the same point, in that "telling" sort of way. I'm trying to be very aware of it.
Writing is such a learning process and I try to get better everyday...aren't we glad we have editors who will tell us what they like and don't like? Helps a bunch!
If it's historical, I get torn right out of the book if contemporary speech is used, or if a current map has been used so they use the wrong name for a town or city.
You covered many of my pet peeves here, another I found over my holiday reading were books with Christmas in the title, yet hardly any Christmas content in the pages.
Just checking in to let you know I'll be making a list of your questions and see that Wanda gets them.
My pet peeves are the same as those of others. I think, right at the moment, that my biggest one is being told over and over again the reason why the H/h can't get together. I can usually read my way through grammar mistakes as I'm not the swiftest person around when it comes to grammar. I have found that more and more small mistakes are creeping into books.For example, when her is used instead of his or even here. I think it's because too many people rely on spell check and don't actually read word for word. Having said that, I can ignore most things that are wrong as long as the story is interesting with not a lot of repetition in it.
I will stop reading a book if it is boring me to tears. I also do not like whiny or mean heros or heroines. I do love Super Romances!!!!
I read mostly Supers, so I don't have a lot of pet peeves. But when I do read other romances I hate when they spend too much time describing the clothes or looks of the characters. I like to picture my own hero. That being said, I probably will want to make sure I describe the hero/heroine somewhat, right?
I don't really have a question for Wanda, other than to say thank you for the reminder of the "little things" that can make a big difference. I have learned so much from this blog and from reading SuperRomances about what it takes to make a romance super. Obviously I have a way to go, but I hope to someday be up to the challenge.
By the time a Super gets to me, all the things I might dislike in a book are pretty much gone. I love my Supers. I do quit reading if the introspective musing is repetitive or lengthy. I guess I don't like brooding characters in fiction or real life.
For me, I like to see strong heroines, I can't stand the ones that are too stupid to live! Strong, independent, critical thinkers, who attract men who are their equals. Carol
Gosh its hard to think about this because if a book doesn't grab me, I don't finish it, and I only remember the ones I do love.
I would say I tend to trip over a really beautiful heroine with a stunning body mainly because my ultimate fantasy as a reader is a plain Jane heroine who gets the gorgeous guy. Also, full on lust (probably not so much a problem with Superromance!) when they first meet as a reader for me is a bit "Are you kidding me?" Really strong attraction, absolutely! But the "I see you, I want to rip your clothes off" thing - reminds me of that line from The Elephant Man (I think) - I am not an animal??
One that drives me wild is repeated poor grammar. I don't mean dialogue, because characters will occasionally speak with less than perfect grammar, as we all do, and some will have poor grammar regularly. I'm referring to narrative with repeated poor grammar or misuse of a word.
Another pet peeve is a hero who goes beyond an angry outburst or a tough demeanor to being downright cruel and arrogant on a consistent basis. I find it very hard for any author to redeem heroes who are cruel and horribly arrogant. I have been pleasantly surprised, but more often I'm disappointed. To me, real cruelty has no place in romance.
Another pet peeve is characters who fail to communicate time and time again. Rather than saying what they think and feel, these characters repeatedly hold back what they really feel and instead say something hurtful or self-protective because they think the love interest thinks or feels something. I can deal with having this happen once or twice, but when it causes crises in their relationship time and time again in a story, I lose interest in whether they get their problems resolved or not.
Fortunately, I don't encounter these romance-killers too often as I studiously avoid authors or lines that tend to write stories with these elements.
Post a Comment